• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Blog Home
  • Topics
    • Keystone Press Releases
    • Politics and Government
    • Legislation
    • Nevada News
    • Tourism & Gaming
    • Rural Nevada
    • Business
    • Opinion
  • Membership
  • Contact Us
  • About Keystone Nevada

Keystone Nevada Korner

Welcome to The Keystone Korner The Official Blog of Keystone Nevada

Home » The Joe Manchin Moment

The Joe Manchin Moment

October 1, 2021 by Pauline Lee

Pelosi and Schumer’s big mistake was to think they could bully him into submission.

By Kimberley A. Strassel, published in Wall Street Journal, October 1, 2021

Credit Sen. Joe Manchin for this week solving a paradox. What happens when an irresistible progressive force meets an immovable senator? Physicists take note: The West Virginian is still standing.

To listen to those progressives and the media, President Biden’s agenda hangs in the balance because Mr. Manchin keeps refusing to say what he “wants.” They deigned to express fury and incredulity at Mr. Manchin’s Wednesday night rejection of their $3.5 trillion entitlement blowout. As our president might say: C’mon! Mr. Manchin has been clear for two solid months now. This pileup is solely the fault of a left that put its fingers in its ears, arrogantly relying on threats.

Politico has now made public a July 28 document, signed by Mr. Manchin and Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, outlining what “agreement” it would take for Mr. Manchin to begin reconciliation. His topline: $1.5 trillion. His top corporate rate: 25%. No debate on the bill prior to Oct. 1. No reconciliation dollars to flow until after Covid funds were disbursed. Only “needs based” programs, with “means testing.” And conditions on climate provisions. “Senator Manchin does not guarantee that he will vote for the final reconciliation legislation if it exceeds the conditions outlined in this agreement,” reads the paper, in bold. This was two weeks before the Senate voted to begin the reconciliation process.

Mr. Manchin broadcast the same to his colleagues in public. On Aug. 11, he issued a statement declaring the $3.5 trillion “irresponsible,” and in a Sept. 2 op-ed in these pages reiterated he would never support that number. He later noted the bill should be at most “1, 1.5” trillion, and laid out his corporate-tax marker. He said he’d reject any process that set an “artificial” topline and “reverse-engineer[ed]” priorities. He said there was “no way” he’d have any answers by Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s deadline of Sept. 27. He also voiced opposition to expanding Medicare and to certain climate provisions, and he noted his means-testing requirement.

Democrats’ response? Mr. Schumer bulled through a $3.5 trillion resolution, disemboweling the Manchin agreement. (Mr. Manchin voted to begin the process, even as he warned he wouldn’t support that as a final number.) Mrs. Pelosi ordered committee chairmen to mark up by Sept. 27 an artificial $3.5 trillion topline that reverse-engineered priorities and included a Medicare expansion, climate provisions, a 26.5% corporate tax, and giveaways to everyone—with nary a means-test in sight. And Democrats suggest Mr. Manchin isn’t operating in “good faith”?

Mr. Manchin’s vote is essential in a 50-50 Senate; nothing happens without him. The Democratic decision to plow ahead with this resolution—knowing that nearly every policy element and some $2 trillion in additional spending had already been rejected by a senator whose support was indispensable—would at any other time be described as mind-boggling ineptitude. Today, it is progressives’ standard operating procedure.

Democratic leaders chose the option they’ve come to rely on: brute force. Instead of negotiating, party leaders arrogantly bet that a two-month campaign of threats, bullying and pressure would cattle-prod Mr. Manchin into line. Mrs. Pelosi took hostage his bipartisan $1 trillion infrastructure package, tying its fate to his willingness to roll over. Liberal activists piled on with protests and smears about his “corruption.” Elected progressives trashed him online. The White House issued summonses. And the whole lot pushed a false narrative that Mr. Manchin was being coy with his demands. There’s nothing coy about a July signed document with the Senate majority leader that reads: “Agreement to Start Budget Resolution.”

There were signs this week that Mr. Manchin was cracking—but not in the manner Democrats planned. He made increasingly clear he had no intention of negotiating a number this week—and certainly not before an infrastructure vote. His responses to a hectoring media grew more terse, and he looked visibly irked when one pundit informed him on Wednesday that Mrs. Pelosi expected “legislative language” on reconciliation by the following day.

A few hours later he released a statement. Democrats want clarity? This was a nuclear truth bomb. The $3.5 trillion plan is “fiscal insanity.” Spending must be geared toward what “we need and can afford—not designed to reengineer the social and economic fabric of this nation or vengefully tax for the sake of wishful spending.” Any new social program must be means-tested. In later remarks Mr. Manchin said that while he remains open to reconciliation, his top is $1.5 trillion, and it’s not happening soon. Live with it.

Is reconciliation still possible? Yes. Might Mr. Manchin be moved to a higher number? Maybe. What is clear is that Bernie Sanders’s wild-eyed $3.5 trillion free-for-all is dead. It’s a black eye to the Biden administration, Mrs. Pelosi and Mr. Schumer, and it’s their own fault.

Mr. Manchin has reminded his colleagues all year that he expects the congressional process to remain one of negotiation, collegiality, order and norms. They should have taken him at his word.

Filed Under: Opinion Tagged With: $3.5 Billion spending, Chuck Schumer, Infrastructure Bill, Joe Manchin, Nancy Pelosi, progressives, Senate

Primary Sidebar

Connect with Us

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
Bootleg Bistro
Bootleg Bistro Ad
SLLC_Keystone_Blog-Ad_300x500_10%-Off-Repairs_05.19.21
CIOServices Ad 300x500-100
BRH Keystone Ad JPEG
Willow_Manor
Keystone Corporation Nevada

News Topics

  • Keystone Press Releases
  • Politics and Government
  • Legislation
  • Nevada News
  • Tourism & Gaming
  • Rural Nevada
  • Business
  • Opinion

Rural Nevada

UPS and AVK America plan to expand in Douglas County

March 19, 2023 By Courtney Holland

Staff Reports for The Record Courier, March 17, 2023 United Parcel Service plans to build a new 168,000 square foot building in Douglas County, … [Read More...] about UPS and AVK America plan to expand in Douglas County

Redwood Materials gets $2 billion federal loan for mega battery facility near Reno

February 12, 2023 By Pauline Lee

by Jason Hidalgo, Reno Gazette-Journal, February 9, 2023 Redwood Materials just secured a commitment from the federal government for a $2 billion … [Read More...] about Redwood Materials gets $2 billion federal loan for mega battery facility near Reno

LETTER: Voting by conscience or from pocketbook?

January 31, 2023 By vrobison

Not everyone enjoys or is interested in politics, but given the number of retirees in the Moapa and Virgin Valleys, I would imagine there is … [Read More...] about LETTER: Voting by conscience or from pocketbook?

Amodei picked as chair for appropriations subcommittee

January 29, 2023 By The Ely Times

Nevada Representative Mark Amodei was appointed to serve as the Chairman of the Legislative Branch Subcommittee on the U.S. House Committee on … [Read More...] about Amodei picked as chair for appropriations subcommittee

Opinion

Hypocrite Biden blocks mineral mining his clean-energy goals require

March 24, 2023 By Pauline Lee

by Carrie Sheffield, New York Post, March 22, 2023 President Joe Biden claims he wants America to lead in “clean energy” production, but he’s again … [Read More...] about Hypocrite Biden blocks mineral mining his clean-energy goals require

OPINION: The ‘Green Amendment’ is well-intended — but that’s not enough

March 19, 2023 By Courtney Holland

By David Colborne, The Nevada Independent, March 19th, 2023 Supporters of AJR3, also known as the “Green Amendment,” want to protect Nevada’s … [Read More...] about OPINION: The ‘Green Amendment’ is well-intended — but that’s not enough

EDITORIAL: Property tax bill deserves a quick trip to the shredder

March 16, 2023 By Courtney Holland

Neal bill would drop the cap, impose a floor. By Las Vegas Review-Journal Editorial Board, March 15, 2023 The benefit of competitive political … [Read More...] about EDITORIAL: Property tax bill deserves a quick trip to the shredder

Tags

Adam Laxalt am post Build Back Better Business Business Columns Casinos & Gaming Catherine Cortez Masto Clark County Clark County School District Conventions COVID Department of Employment Training and Rehabilitation (DETR) Editorials Education employment Gov. Joe Lombardo Gov. Steve Sisolak Governor's Office of Economic Development (GOED) Housing inflation Inside Gaming Joe Lombardo Local Local Las Vegas Local Nevada lvcva mc-business mc-local mc-news mc-opinion mc-sports Nevada News NPRI Opinion Opinion Columns PAID pandemic Politics and Government Real Estate Insider Roe v. Wade Sports The Strip tourism Victor Joecks

Footer

Copyright © 2023 · Keystone Corporation - All Rights Reserved · Log in
Privacy Policy
By accessing this site, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use

The views, opinions and conclusions expressed by the authors of any article or post on the Keystone Korner are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Keystone Corporation or its officers and board members. Moreover, any reference to a person, party, product or entity does not constitute an endorsement or recommendation by Keystone Corporation or its officers and board members.