• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Blog Home
  • Topics
    • Keystone Press Releases
    • Politics and Government
    • Legislation
    • Nevada News
    • Tourism & Gaming
    • Rural Nevada
    • Business
    • Opinion
  • Membership
  • Contact Us
  • About Keystone Nevada

Keystone Nevada Korner

Welcome to The Keystone Korner The Official Blog of Keystone Nevada

Home » Subsidies Only Feed Inflation

Subsidies Only Feed Inflation

September 18, 2022 by Pauline Lee

Even if they ostensibly go to consumers, they end up enriching companies by enabling higher prices.

by Tomas J. Philipson, The Wall Street Journal, September 15, 2022

President Biden insists he is fighting inflation by making things more affordable for middle-class American households. To that end, his administration and Congress trotted out big-dollar subsidies for consumers of green energy, drugs and higher education last month. But the bulk of that federal cash will likely end up in the pockets of companies, not consumers. August may go down as an epic month of feeding the fat cats.

In a normal market, sellers receive the price buyers pay. If you have a garage sale where your chair sells for $100, you get all $100. But there are virtually no such markets in the U.S. anymore because taxes and subsidies jam a wedge between what buyers pay and sellers receive. Companies pay more for workers than workers take home because of income and payroll taxes. Poor patients pay less than what hospitals receive because of Medicaid subsidies.

Economists recognize that government intervention in a market results not in a single price but two—a “demand price” paid by buyers and a “supply price” received by sellers.

When a market is subsidized, buyers and sellers both typically benefit through a rise in the supply price and a fall in the demand price. Companies get more but consumers pay less, courtesy of taxpayers. But which party the law designates as the recipient of a subsidy—consumers or companies—doesn’t determine who gains from the subsidy. That’s determined by the structure of subsidies and market forces, which is why the consumer subsidies launched in August will likely amount to a generous corporate-welfare program.

Consider the new regulations accompanying the student-loan forgiveness program. The Biden administration is heavily expanding income-driven repayment, which caps what borrowers pay each month. The implication seems to be that students can borrow more at no additional cost. “Most of these plans cancel a borrower’s remaining debt once they make 20 years of monthly payments,” according to the White House. Universities can raise tuition (the supply price) without affecting the total loan payment by students (the demand price). Or the student can borrow more than necessary and invest the money with no intention of ever paying back the loan, reducing the effective tuition further. Unfortunately, the gift from taxpayers will likely go to the most expensive schools and the ones with the largest endowments.

Likewise, the administration pitched many of the green-energy subsidies of the Inflation Reduction Act as a relief to consumers. Subsidies for heat pumps, rooftop solar panels and electric air conditioners will supposedly make homes more energy-efficient and therefore cheaper to maintain. Tax credits for electric vehicles are meant to hasten the transition away from gasoline, but manufacturers are already raising supply prices by the exact amount of the subsidies, with demand prices remaining constant. This is the predicted result of a subsidy when suppliers have market power—as the electric-vehicle oligopoly does—and when there is excess demand for the product. When markets are more competitive, companies pass the value of the subsidies on to consumers because if they don’t, a competitor will.

The Inflation Reduction Act’s caps on copays in the Medicare drug program ensure further distortions to that already convoluted market. The maximum demand price at the pharmacy—$2,000 starting in 2025 under the Inflation Reduction Act—will show up for consumers as higher premiums, but taxpayers already subsidize 75% of those. The bottom line is that demand prices will be further decoupled from increased supply prices.

Mr. Biden may genuinely believe these consumer subsidies will help take the inflationary pressure off the household budgets of middle-class Americans. But the hard truth is that market forces decide who benefits from government subsidies. That’s why supply-side competition is often the best way to protect consumers from higher prices.

Mr. Philipson is an economist at the University of Chicago. He served as a member of President Trump’s Council of Economic Advisers and was acting chairman, 2019-20.

Filed Under: Opinion Tagged With: Inflation Reduction Act, subsidies for American households

Primary Sidebar

Connect with Us

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
Bootleg Bistro
Bootleg Bistro Ad
SLLC_Keystone_Blog-Ad_300x500_10%-Off-Repairs_05.19.21
CIOServices Ad 300x500-100
BRH Keystone Ad JPEG
Keystone Corporation Nevada

News Topics

  • Keystone Press Releases
  • Politics and Government
  • Legislation
  • Nevada News
  • Tourism & Gaming
  • Rural Nevada
  • Business
  • Opinion

Rural Nevada

BLM cites mining company over endangered wildflower

January 18, 2023 By Colton Lochhead

The Bureau of Land Management has cited a mining company for trespassing on the habitat of a endangered wildflower in rural Nevada. The federal … [Read More...] about BLM cites mining company over endangered wildflower

Rio Tinto puts renewable diesel to test

January 15, 2023 By Pauline Lee

by Elko Daily Rio Tinto announced it is progressing with its plans to swap conventional diesel for renewable fuel in haul trucks at its U.S. mining … [Read More...] about Rio Tinto puts renewable diesel to test

Ex-Tesla executive’s battery company nets $106M tax incentives

December 3, 2022 By McKenna Ross

A lithium battery recycling company headed by a former Tesla executive was approved for a $105.6 million tax abatement for its plan to expand a … [Read More...] about Ex-Tesla executive’s battery company nets $106M tax incentives

Nevada Copper closes restart financing package

October 30, 2022 By Pauline Lee

by Elko Daily, October 27, 2022 Nevada Copper announced that it closed a restart financing package with its key financial partners on Oct. 28. The … [Read More...] about Nevada Copper closes restart financing package

Opinion

Water Is a Terrible Thing for California to Waste

January 22, 2023 By Pauline Lee

The Golden State hasn’t built the storage to make use of winter rains. by The Wall Street Journal Editorial Board, January 17, 2023 California’s … [Read More...] about Water Is a Terrible Thing for California to Waste

How the Davos elite took back control

January 22, 2023 By Pauline Lee

by Thomas Fazi, Unherd.com, January 16, 2023 Thousands of the world’s global elite are convening in Davos this morning for their most important … [Read More...] about How the Davos elite took back control

Nancy Pelosi’s Other Legacy: A Mountain of Debt for Our Children

January 22, 2023 By Pauline Lee

Despite a surging national debt, the spending orgy continues in Washington. Sunday, January 15, 2023, FEE by John Miltimore, FEE … [Read More...] about Nancy Pelosi’s Other Legacy: A Mountain of Debt for Our Children

Tags

Adam Laxalt Build Back Better Business Business Columns Casinos & Gaming Catherine Cortez Masto Clark County Clark County School District Conventions COVID Department of Employment Training and Rehabilitation (DETR) Editorials Education employment Gov. Steve Sisolak Housing inflation Inside Gaming Joe Lombardo Local Local Las Vegas Local Nevada lvcva mask mandate mc-business mc-local mc-news mc-opinion mc-sports Nevada News North Las Vegas NPRI Opinion Opinion Columns PAID pandemic Politics and Government Real Estate Insider Roe v. Wade Separation of Powers Sports The Strip tourism Victor Joecks

Footer

Copyright © 2023 · Keystone Corporation - All Rights Reserved · Log in
Privacy Policy
By accessing this site, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use

The views, opinions and conclusions expressed by the authors of any article or post on the Keystone Korner are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Keystone Corporation or its officers and board members. Moreover, any reference to a person, party, product or entity does not constitute an endorsement or recommendation by Keystone Corporation or its officers and board members.