• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Blog Home
  • Topics
    • Keystone Press Releases
    • Politics and Government
    • Legislation
    • Nevada News
    • Tourism & Gaming
    • Rural Nevada
    • Business
    • Opinion
  • Membership
  • Contact Us
  • About Keystone Nevada

Keystone Nevada Korner

Welcome to The Keystone Korner The Official Blog of Keystone Nevada

Home » Cancel Culture Targets Charity

Cancel Culture Targets Charity

January 30, 2022 by Pauline Lee

Left-wing political activists want to destroy America’s long tradition of private philanthropy.

By Jeremy Tedesco, Opinion Section of The Wall Street Journal, January 18, 2022

Americans have always been free to give to nonprofit causes they believe in, but left-wing political activists are determined to limit that freedom. Considering these activists’ record of successfully convincing corporations to do their bidding on a host of issues, everyone who supports the American traditions of free speech, free association and privacy should be concerned.

Unmasking Fidelity, a loose coalition of fringe groups, recently delivered a list of demands to Fidelity Charitable, which manages a donor-advised fund through which account holders can direct contributions to their favorite nonprofits. According to its website, Fidelity Charitable distributed $9.1 billion in 2020, making it the nation’s largest grant maker.

On the list of Unmasking Fidelity’s demands was a call for Fidelity Charitable to disclose five years’ worth of its contributions to 10 targeted organizations, including the Family Research Council, Turning Point USA and my employer, the Alliance Defending Freedom. These are organizations with which the activists disagree on a variety of hot-button issues. Unmasking Fidelity is also demanding that Fidelity Charitable impose viewpoint-based litmus tests on the charities and causes its account holders can support. Those litmus tests would handicap conservative groups and advocacy.

No matter what you think about the issues of the day, everyone should oppose this name-and-shame censorship. A politicized philanthropic culture, in which an outside activist’s demands trump a donor’s intent—and even expose donors to harassment—is dangerous for people of every political stripe.

All of us, but perhaps especially Fidelity Charitable (given the diverse views held by their donor-advised fund account holders), should advocate a healthy philanthropic culture. Such a culture is marked by at least two critical features. First is respect for donor intent. Donors must be free to give to any cause or interest they choose. In this way, charitable giving contributes significantly to a flourishing, open marketplace of ideas, which is essential to maintaining a free society and driving societal improvements.

Second is respect for donor privacy. Just last year, the U.S. Supreme Court decided two cases on this very issue. In Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Bonta, which was consolidated with my firm’s case, Thomas More Law Center v. Bonta, the court struck down a state donor-disclosure regulation because it violated the First Amendment rights of charities and their supporters. Requiring nonprofits to disclose their donors not only exposes existing donors to the loss of privacy and the threat of harassment; it also discourages charitable giving and participation in the marketplace of ideas.

That’s precisely what Unmasking Fidelity hopes will happen. The group wants to destroy the country’s unique charitable culture, which has made Americans the world’s most generous population. And if a philanthropic leader like Fidelity Charitable capitulates, it will accelerate that destruction, as many more institutions will likely follow its lead.

Those who care about philanthropic freedom aren’t about to sit idly by and watch Unmasking Fidelity strip Americans of their rights to free speech, free association and privacy. That’s why more than 1,800 financial advisers, investment professionals and nonprofit leaders have signed a letter urging Fidelity Charitable’s leadership to reject Unmasking Fidelity’s demand that it serve as a roadblock to charitable giving.

Instead, Fidelity Charitable should stand by its commitment to be “cause neutral” and to refrain from limiting “grantmaking . . . to specific organizations based on political, religious, or philosophical grounds.” The path forward for Fidelity Charitable and other institutions that offer donor-advised funds is to permit account holders to donate to any recognized 501(c)(3) nonprofit, to protect donors’ privacy, and to refrain from imposing viewpoint-based litmus tests on donors’ charitable choices.

Despite efforts by radicals like those at Unmasking Fidelity, there is broad support for this approach. As the justices observed in Bonta, parties that “span the ideological spectrum” filed briefs urging the high court to protect donor privacy—“from the American Civil Liberties Union to the Proposition 8 Legal Defense Fund; from the Council on American-Islamic Relations to the Zionist Organization of America; from Feeding America-Eastern Wisconsin to PBS Reno.” Even the Southern Poverty Law Center—a primary agitator for expanding cancel culture to charitable giving—filed a brief supporting donor privacy.

Public advocacy is for everyone, not only those able and willing to weather abuse. And donors have good reason to fear abuse. In our present age of cancel culture and social media mobs, too many are quick to threaten, harass and intimidate those with whom they disagree. Rather than drive a wedge where there is common ground by adopting Unmasking Fidelity’s divisive and corrupting proposals, Fidelity Charitable should continue to work for the good of all its account holders, and society at large, by vigorously protecting philanthropic freedom.

Mr. Tedesco is senior counsel and senior vice president of corporate engagement for Alliance Defending Freedom.

Filed Under: Opinion Tagged With: Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Vonta, Fidelity Charitable, state donor-disclosure regulation

Primary Sidebar

Connect with Us

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
Bootleg Bistro
Bootleg Bistro Ad
SLLC_Keystone_Blog-Ad_300x500_10%-Off-Repairs_05.19.21
CIOServices Ad 300x500-100
BRH Keystone Ad JPEG
Willow_Manor
Keystone Corporation Nevada

News Topics

  • Keystone Press Releases
  • Politics and Government
  • Legislation
  • Nevada News
  • Tourism & Gaming
  • Rural Nevada
  • Business
  • Opinion

Rural Nevada

UPS and AVK America plan to expand in Douglas County

March 19, 2023 By Courtney Holland

Staff Reports for The Record Courier, March 17, 2023 United Parcel Service plans to build a new 168,000 square foot building in Douglas County, … [Read More...] about UPS and AVK America plan to expand in Douglas County

Redwood Materials gets $2 billion federal loan for mega battery facility near Reno

February 12, 2023 By Pauline Lee

by Jason Hidalgo, Reno Gazette-Journal, February 9, 2023 Redwood Materials just secured a commitment from the federal government for a $2 billion … [Read More...] about Redwood Materials gets $2 billion federal loan for mega battery facility near Reno

LETTER: Voting by conscience or from pocketbook?

January 31, 2023 By vrobison

Not everyone enjoys or is interested in politics, but given the number of retirees in the Moapa and Virgin Valleys, I would imagine there is … [Read More...] about LETTER: Voting by conscience or from pocketbook?

Amodei picked as chair for appropriations subcommittee

January 29, 2023 By The Ely Times

Nevada Representative Mark Amodei was appointed to serve as the Chairman of the Legislative Branch Subcommittee on the U.S. House Committee on … [Read More...] about Amodei picked as chair for appropriations subcommittee

Opinion

Hypocrite Biden blocks mineral mining his clean-energy goals require

March 24, 2023 By Pauline Lee

by Carrie Sheffield, New York Post, March 22, 2023 President Joe Biden claims he wants America to lead in “clean energy” production, but he’s again … [Read More...] about Hypocrite Biden blocks mineral mining his clean-energy goals require

OPINION: The ‘Green Amendment’ is well-intended — but that’s not enough

March 19, 2023 By Courtney Holland

By David Colborne, The Nevada Independent, March 19th, 2023 Supporters of AJR3, also known as the “Green Amendment,” want to protect Nevada’s … [Read More...] about OPINION: The ‘Green Amendment’ is well-intended — but that’s not enough

EDITORIAL: Property tax bill deserves a quick trip to the shredder

March 16, 2023 By Courtney Holland

Neal bill would drop the cap, impose a floor. By Las Vegas Review-Journal Editorial Board, March 15, 2023 The benefit of competitive political … [Read More...] about EDITORIAL: Property tax bill deserves a quick trip to the shredder

Tags

Adam Laxalt am post Build Back Better Business Business Columns Casinos & Gaming Catherine Cortez Masto Clark County Clark County School District Conventions COVID Department of Employment Training and Rehabilitation (DETR) Editorials Education employment Gov. Joe Lombardo Gov. Steve Sisolak Governor's Office of Economic Development (GOED) Housing inflation Inside Gaming Joe Lombardo Local Local Las Vegas Local Nevada lvcva mc-business mc-local mc-news mc-opinion mc-sports Nevada News NPRI Opinion Opinion Columns PAID pandemic Politics and Government Real Estate Insider Roe v. Wade Sports The Strip tourism Victor Joecks

Footer

Copyright © 2023 · Keystone Corporation - All Rights Reserved · Log in
Privacy Policy
By accessing this site, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use

The views, opinions and conclusions expressed by the authors of any article or post on the Keystone Korner are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Keystone Corporation or its officers and board members. Moreover, any reference to a person, party, product or entity does not constitute an endorsement or recommendation by Keystone Corporation or its officers and board members.