• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Blog Home
  • Topics
    • Keystone Press Releases
    • Politics and Government
    • Legislation
    • Nevada News
    • Tourism & Gaming
    • Rural Nevada
    • Business
    • Opinion
  • Membership
  • Contact Us
  • About Keystone Nevada

Keystone Nevada Korner

Welcome to The Keystone Korner The Official Blog of Keystone Nevada

Home » 9th Circuit panel hears Station Casinos’ appeal of NLRB bargaining order

9th Circuit panel hears Station Casinos’ appeal of NLRB bargaining order

October 17, 2021 by Pauline Lee

By Colton Lochhead Las Vegas Review-Journal October 14, 2021 – 7:12 pm

Station Casinos wants a federal appeals court to overturn an order forcing the company to bargain in good faith with Nevada’s most prominent union, regardless of whether the court finds the gaming giant broke federal labor laws.

The company’s arguments follow a July order by U.S. District Judge Gloria Navarro that requires Station to bargain with the Culinary Union until a federal labor board makes a ruling on the dispute.

Navarro’s decision stems from a complaint filed by the prosecuting arm of the National Labor Relations Board that accuses the company of using an offer of enhanced employee benefits as a way of swaying support away from the union in the run-up to a December 2019 union election at Red Rock Resort, a vote that ultimately failed.

On Thursday, Joel Rice, an attorney representing Station’s parent company Red Rock Resorts Inc., told a three-judge panel on the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that he does not believe that the company’s offer of enhanced benefits should be considered an unfair labor practice. The company, he said, had been discussing the benefits plans “weeks and even months” before the union filed a petition at the resort property.

But even if the court were to deem that as an unfair labor practice, it did not warrant “the extreme remedy” of a mandated bargaining order, Rice said.

“It replaces employee choice at the ballot box with judicial fiat,” he said.

Rice said that the lower court should have used other remedies such as calling for a new union election, which he said is normally the way unfair labor practice grievances have been addressed.

In her order, Navarro wrote that the company’s offer to enhance benefits “likely thwarted the union’s majority status and was so outrageous that it undermined the fairness of future elections.”

Jenevieve Frank, an attorney representing Cornele Overstreet, regional director of the National Labor Relations Board, echoed the judge’s comments.

“There won’t be the ability to truly ever test what the uncoerced desires of employees are,” Frank said.

Frank said that the company was “well aware of increasing support among employees and the likelihood of an election petition at Red Rock Resort when Station developed and implemented a plan to decimate union support with a scheme of lavish and highly desirable benefits explicitly designed to coerce employees’ free choice.”

Thursday’s hearing was the latest skirmish in the yearslong fight that has pitted one of the state’s most powerful unions against one of its most powerful companies.

The Culinary Union has been trying to get union votes scheduled at Station properties for seven years. Some of those campaigns have been successful, but Station and the union have not signed a contract at any of those properties. A number of employees at Boulder Station and Palace Station in August and September signed petitions asking to leave their union representation.

In a statement, Culinary Union spokeswoman Bethany Khan said that the union had always maintained that Station Casinos had interfered with workers’ right to a fair union election under federal law, and that the labor board would find the company’s tactics to be illegal.

“Station Casinos shamefully keeps trying to delay and drag things out in court rather than do the right thing, keep their word, (the company has said many times that they would respect an NLRB union election), and negotiate a contract,” she added.

‘Not a novel issue’

If upheld by the appeals court, the ruling would be a landmark decision in the lengthy battle between the two sides, said UNLV labor law professor Ruben Garcia.

“This is a long-term campaign and people have watched it for a long time. So to have this be upheld by the courts would be pretty momentous legally and in the history of the dispute between these two parties,” Garcia said.

Garcia said that the case likely won’t rise above the appeals court because it is “a really typical case” of allegations of an employer increasing benefits during a campaign to dissuade employees from unionizing.

“It’s not a novel issue,” he said.

The board’s decision to seek the injunction against Station that Navarro granted, however, is a signal of potential change happening in the federal labor law sphere. Since the Biden administration came in at the beginning of the year, the board has been more aggressive, Garcia said.

“The previous administration, and the administrations before, were less willing to seek the injunction. The board is being very proactive in these six to eight months,” he said.

Both sides entrenched

Navarro’s decision forces Station to bargain with the union while the National Labor Relations Board moves forward with its own case against the company in a separate process. One potential outcome from the board could be to issue a ruling similar to Navarro’s order, all but cementing the mandated bargaining.

Whatever the the board eventually decides on the case will likely be appealed as both sides seem entrenched in the fight, said Bill Werner, an associate professor of hospitality at UNLV with a focus on labor relations.

“When a company decides that the best course of action is to fight the union every step of the way, that strategy only succeeds when the union gives up and goes away. And that’s not gonna happen here. The Culinary Union is not going to give up on Stations, that’s one thing we know for sure,” he said.

The panel took the case under submission, and Garcia said he thinks there could be a decision by the end of the year.

But no matter the outcome in this case, the long-running fight between Station Casinos and the Culinary Union is far from over.

Contact Colton Lochhead at [email protected] Follow @ColtonLochhead on Twitter.

Filed Under: Business Tagged With: bargaining, Culinary Union, enhanced employee benefits, federal appeals court, NLRB, NLRB Bargaining Order, Station Casinos, swaying support from the union, unfair labor practice

Primary Sidebar

Connect with Us

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
Bootleg Bistro
Bootleg Bistro Ad
SLLC_Keystone_Blog-Ad_300x500_10%-Off-Repairs_05.19.21
CIOServices Ad 300x500-100
BRH Keystone Ad JPEG
Willow_Manor
Keystone Corporation Nevada

News Topics

  • Keystone Press Releases
  • Politics and Government
  • Legislation
  • Nevada News
  • Tourism & Gaming
  • Rural Nevada
  • Business
  • Opinion

Rural Nevada

30 new projects in Pahrump: Arby’s, Chipotle, Midas Muffler, 3 convenient stores & more

March 29, 2023 By Courtney Holland

By Robin Hebrock, Pahrump Valley Times, March 28, 2023 Business is booming in the Pahrump Valley, with dozens of new companies looking to bring … [Read More...] about 30 new projects in Pahrump: Arby’s, Chipotle, Midas Muffler, 3 convenient stores & more

UPS and AVK America plan to expand in Douglas County

March 19, 2023 By Courtney Holland

Staff Reports for The Record Courier, March 17, 2023 United Parcel Service plans to build a new 168,000 square foot building in Douglas County, … [Read More...] about UPS and AVK America plan to expand in Douglas County

Redwood Materials gets $2 billion federal loan for mega battery facility near Reno

February 12, 2023 By Pauline Lee

by Jason Hidalgo, Reno Gazette-Journal, February 9, 2023 Redwood Materials just secured a commitment from the federal government for a $2 billion … [Read More...] about Redwood Materials gets $2 billion federal loan for mega battery facility near Reno

LETTER: Voting by conscience or from pocketbook?

January 31, 2023 By vrobison

Not everyone enjoys or is interested in politics, but given the number of retirees in the Moapa and Virgin Valleys, I would imagine there is … [Read More...] about LETTER: Voting by conscience or from pocketbook?

Opinion

OPINION: NEVADA VIEWS: Government over the taxpayers

March 26, 2023 By Courtney Holland

By Robert Fellner, The Las Vegas Review Journal, March 25, 2023 The legislative proposal to raise Nevadans’ property taxes highlights why … [Read More...] about OPINION: NEVADA VIEWS: Government over the taxpayers

Hypocrite Biden blocks mineral mining his clean-energy goals require

March 24, 2023 By Pauline Lee

by Carrie Sheffield, New York Post, March 22, 2023 President Joe Biden claims he wants America to lead in “clean energy” production, but he’s again … [Read More...] about Hypocrite Biden blocks mineral mining his clean-energy goals require

OPINION: The ‘Green Amendment’ is well-intended — but that’s not enough

March 19, 2023 By Courtney Holland

By David Colborne, The Nevada Independent, March 19th, 2023 Supporters of AJR3, also known as the “Green Amendment,” want to protect Nevada’s … [Read More...] about OPINION: The ‘Green Amendment’ is well-intended — but that’s not enough

Tags

Adam Laxalt am post Build Back Better Business Business Columns Casinos & Gaming Catherine Cortez Masto Clark County Clark County School District Conventions COVID Department of Employment Training and Rehabilitation (DETR) Editorials Education employment Gov. Joe Lombardo Gov. Steve Sisolak Governor's Office of Economic Development (GOED) Housing inflation Inside Gaming Joe Lombardo las vegas Local Local Las Vegas Local Nevada lvcva mc-business mc-local mc-news mc-opinion mc-sports Nevada News NPRI Opinion Opinion Columns PAID Politics and Government Real Estate Insider Roe v. Wade Sports The Strip tourism Victor Joecks

Footer

Copyright © 2023 · Keystone Corporation - All Rights Reserved · Log in
Privacy Policy
By accessing this site, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use

The views, opinions and conclusions expressed by the authors of any article or post on the Keystone Korner are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Keystone Corporation or its officers and board members. Moreover, any reference to a person, party, product or entity does not constitute an endorsement or recommendation by Keystone Corporation or its officers and board members.